楼主: dearhang

消毒剂的使用是否会导致微生物对消毒剂的耐药?

[复制链接]

0

主题

180

帖子

40

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
40
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:10 | 显示全部楼层


回复7#

感谢提供PPT,阅览后再回复






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

180

帖子

40

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
40
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:11 | 显示全部楼层


薛广波教授幻灯中所举消毒剂抗药性例子的其中两张幻灯(第16和第30页),实际上是抗菌素的耐药性






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

6175

帖子

5961

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
5961
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:12 | 显示全部楼层


自然界是充满矛盾的,一家独大的事不能存在。认同#13、14、15shifang老师提及的内容。日常工作中,理应交替使用消杀剂,而非“独孤一味”(广州方言:味道单一之意),与正确规范化使用抗生素同途,阻遏超级细菌产生。谢谢!






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

2940

帖子

671

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
671
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:13 | 显示全部楼层

这是一个很好的话题,值得引起广泛关注与研究。


1、微生物对消毒剂的耐药性,随着消毒剂的广泛、局部或阶段性的滥用,微生物对消毒剂的耐药性会客观存在的。
2、截止目前就这方面的研究和实验的数量还不多,
3、微生物对消毒剂的耐药性没有引起人们的广泛关注,
4、目前大多数关注的还只是微生物对抗菌药物的耐药性。






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

180

帖子

40

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
40
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:14 | 显示全部楼层


提起此话题的缘由是本人要在即将召开的第17届全国感控会上担任翻译,提前预习了讲者的幻灯。但看了14楼老师提供的文章后惊奇地发现该讲者幻灯内容的一部分与《细菌的消毒剂耐药性》完全一致。






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

180

帖子

40

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
40
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:15 | 显示全部楼层


想请教一下各位老师:

Disinfectant resistance和Disinfectant tolerance之间的区别在哪里?我们目前所说的消毒剂耐药到底是resistance还是tolerance?






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

1954

帖子

34

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
34
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:16 | 显示全部楼层


resistance意为抵抗、耐药;tolerance意为忍受,耐受。前者属于主动抵抗行为,而后者偏向被动接受。






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

1031

帖子

639

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
639
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:17 | 显示全部楼层


本帖最后由 蓝鱼o_0 于 2011-5-6 09:20 编辑

回复 1# jchsmg

纵观近年来突发公共卫生,从2003年的SARS肆虐,到2004年的禽流感H5N1,从2008年的“汶川大地震”, 2009年甲型H1N1流感世界大流行,到2010年“超级细菌”(NDM-1)的多国暴发,消毒均在切断“传播途径”预防控制感染暴发中日益发挥越来越重要的作用。尽管目前尚未发现化学消毒剂对微生物有显著“失效”的现象,然而越来越多的研究已经表明,微生物对消毒剂的抗力显著增加(MIC和MBC显著增高),说明细菌在“选择压力”下,变异加快。值得注意的是,众多研究发现,微生物对某些消毒剂的抗性与其对抗生素的耐药性之间存在“关联现象”,例如吴晓松等人发现鲍曼不动杆菌抗药基因阳性株对多数消毒剂耐受浓度增加,对氯己定有抗性的假单胞菌同时对多种抗生素耐药,对三氯羟基二苯醚抗性的大肠杆菌和假单胞菌也对多种抗生素耐药;金黄色葡萄球菌对β-内酰胺类抗生素的耐药性与对季铵盐的抗性有关等等。众多事实皆说明,消毒剂与抗生素之间存在的交叉抗性。这些关联尚需要在更多的基础研究和流行病学研究中证实。这无疑给我们敲响了警钟,可以预言临床微生物对抗生素耐药的情况在一定会在“微生物存活——消毒剂灭活”的博弈中重现。为此,感控人员必须运用自己的专业知识,更科学、更合理、更高效的使用化学消毒剂,在未来应对突发公共卫生事件应急和医院感染控制中,发挥更重要的作用。


【原创】即将发表于中国消毒学专讲,如需引用请注明SIFIC或者论文作者,谢谢!






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

2687

帖子

2578

积分

金牌会员

Rank: 6Rank: 6

积分
2578
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:18 | 显示全部楼层


今天又学到一点新知识,过去没这方面的意识,其实化学消毒剂过量使用对人体等是有害的,也是一种污染,尽量避免使用,如果使用严格按要求去用(浓度,剂量)






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

3287

帖子

99

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
99
发表于 2010-10-12 11:47:19 | 显示全部楼层

回复 21# 蓝鱼o_0
在论坛说说,引起大家的关注是好的,但我认为,如果准备发表在杂志上,而且是可信度比较高的杂志,建议除了引用国内的研究证据以外,还应搜索一下国外的研究证据,进行比较全面的、有根有据的描述,让各个层面的人员心里有底,避免造成不必要的恐慌。
从美国《Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008》来看,滥用消毒剂会不会诱导对消毒剂不敏感的微生物?对消毒剂不敏感的微生物会不会对抗菌药物也降低敏感性?以及二者是否存在交叉耐受?这些问题更多的是一种学术层面上的探讨和研究,就目前的证据来看,这些问题并不影响我们日常抗菌药物的规范使用,以及我们日常的环境消毒方案。当然据我所知,有些消毒剂的厂家把他们的消毒剂对多重耐药菌的杀灭效果作为一个卖点,对于专业人员来说,我相信大家都有自己的判断能力。
Susceptibility of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Disinfectants
As with antibiotics, reduced susceptibility (or acquired “resistance”) of bacteria to disinfectants can arise by either chromosomal gene mutation or acquisition of genetic material in the form of plasmids or transposons 338, 341-343, 344 , 345, 346. When changes occur in bacterial susceptibility that renders an antibiotic ineffective against an infection previously treatable by that antibiotic, the bacteria are referred to as “resistant.” In contrast, reduced susceptibility to disinfectants does not correlate with failure of the disinfectant because concentrations used in disinfection still greatly exceed the cidal level. Thus, the word "resistance" when applied to these changes is incorrect, and the preferred term is “reduced susceptibility” or “increased tolerance”344, 347. No data are available that show that antibiotic-resistant bacteria are less sensitive to the liquid chemical germicides than antibiotic-sensitive bacteria at currently used germicide contact conditions and concentrations.
MRSA and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) are important health-care–associated agents. Some antiseptics and disinfectants have been known for years to be, because of MICs, somewhat less inhibitory to S. aureus strains that contain a plasmid-carrying gene encoding resistance to the antibiotic gentamicin 344. For example, gentamicin resistance has been shown to also encode reduced susceptibility to propamidine, quaternary ammonium compounds, and ethidium bromide 348, and MRSA strains have been found to be less susceptible than methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains to chlorhexidine, propamidine, and the quaternary ammonium compound cetrimide 349. In other studies, MRSA and MSSA strains have been equally sensitive to phenols and chlorhexidine, but MRSA strains were slightly more tolerant to quaternary ammonium compounds 350. Two gene families (qacCD [now referred to as smr] and qacAB) are involved in providing protection against agents that are components of disinfectant formulations such as quaternary ammonium compounds. Staphylococci have been proposed to evade destruction because the protein specified by the qacA determinant is a cytoplasmic-membrane–associated protein involved in an efflux system that actively reduces intracellular accumulation of toxicants, such as quaternary ammonium compounds, to intracellular targets 351.
Other studies demonstrated that plasmid-mediated formaldehyde tolerance is transferable from Serratia marcescens to E. coli 352 and plasmid-mediated quaternary ammonium tolerance is transferable from S. aureus to E. coli.353. Tolerance to mercury and silver also is plasmid borne 341, 343-346.
Because the concentrations of disinfectants used in practice are much higher than the MICs observed, even for the more tolerant strains, the clinical relevance of these observations is questionable. Several studies have found antibiotic-resistant hospital strains of common healthcare-associated pathogens (i.e., Enterococcus, P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. coli, S. aureus, and S. epidermidis) to be equally susceptible to disinfectants as antibiotic-sensitive strains 53, 354-356. The susceptibility of glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus was similar to vancomycin-susceptible, MRSA 357. On the basis of these data, routine disinfection and housekeeping protocols do not need to be altered because of antibiotic resistance provided the disinfection method is effective 358, 359. A study that evaluated the efficacy of selected cleaning methods (e.g., QUAT-sprayed cloth, and QUAT-immersed cloth) for eliminating VRE found that currently used disinfection processes most likely are highly effective in eliminating VRE. However, surface disinfection must involve contact with all contaminated surfaces 358. A new method using an invisible flurorescent marker to objectively evaluate the thoroughness of cleaning activities in patient rooms might lead to improvement in cleaning of all objects and surfaces but needs further evaluation 360.
Lastly, does the use of antiseptics or disinfectants facilitate the development of disinfectant-tolerant organisms? Evidence and reviews indicate enhanced tolerance to disinfectants can be developed in response to disinfectant exposure 334, 335, 346, 347, 361. However, the level of tolerance is not important in clinical terms because it is low and unlikely to compromise the effectiveness of disinfectants of which much higher concentrations are used 347, 362.
The issue of whether low-level tolerance to germicides selects for antibiotic-resistant strains is unsettled but might depend on the mechanism by which tolerance is attained. For example, changes in the permeability barrier or efflux mechanisms might affect susceptibility to both antibiotics and germicides, but specific changes to a target site might not. Some researchers have suggested that use of disinfectants or antiseptics (e.g., triclosan) could facilitate development of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms 334, 335, 363. Although evidence in laboratory studies indicates low-level resistance to triclosan, the concentrations of triclosan in these studies were low (generally
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|(浙ICP备16040142号-3)|山东省消毒供应质量控制中心

Powered by Discuz! X3.4© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表